Saturday, June 26, 2010

Truths Revealed in Due Times

(24) God "hath in due times manifested his word" (Titus 1: 3), prior to which times it was impossible to unlock its secrets. For examples:...

...(e) During the 40-year Parousia, the time of the Little Flock's reaping, Bro. Russell thought that the Time of Trouble would end shortly after 1914; and it is not yet due for us to know exactly when it will end. Also, in F 128, 129, Bro. Russell gave an immature thought when he wrote that Gershon types "the saved world of mankind" (see F, Appendix, Note 1, for further light on this as it became due). Bro. Russell brought forth light on the non-Spirit-begotten consecrated—the Youthful Worthies—as it became due to be given in the Parousia period after the general call to the High Calling ended in 1881; but many Scriptures regarding the Youthful Worthies were not opened up through God's special servants for them until they came forth as a separate class in the Epiphany, with special need for this Truth as due.
PT. 1977 Pg. 89, 90

Saturday, June 19, 2010

Permanent Marker Series: E4, Page 356


(Click the above image for best quality.)
Page 356 has to be changed too in order to fit the current view. The Youthful Worthy class is no longer being developed "now" in the Epiphany, but should be moved back to 1881. What error the Executive Trustee has introduced.

Saturday, June 12, 2010

The Lopsided Presentation of Truth

PT 1966 Pg. 45-47
Question (1966)—What is meant by “a lopsided presentation of Truth”?




Answer.—It is a presentation of Truth that is not
well balanced; it leans more to one side than to the
other, often emphasizing one side of the truth on a
subject, even to the exclusion of, the ignoring of, or
the denial of any other side of the same truth, thus
giving an unbalanced, biased viewpoint, which usually
leads into serious error. It is another very subtle way
in which Satan works to deceive the Lord’s people.

To illustrate: Bro. Johnson (as set forth in the
answer to the previous question) showed clearly that
the Epiphany, or Apocalypse, period is (1) in its
narrow, or restricted, sense the period from 1914 to
1954...

Saturday, June 5, 2010

Permanent Marker Series: E4, Page 353


(Click the above image for best quality.)
Page 353 falls into the same category as the previously edited pages, but with one additional issue. By modifying Bro. Johnson's comments to Pastor Russell's text, it no longer makes much sense and it almost forces us to edit his work as well. By now, you can see how much this "present view" idea changes the Truth.

Saturday, May 29, 2010

Some Pyramid Corroborations of Epiphany Dates

PT 1947, pages 7-14:

...and to the High Calling, with its end at the time of the last Spirit-begettal, Sept. 16, 1914, when the final "living stone" was set in the Body, to be built up to Jesus as the heavenly Head-stone...

...May not these 7 overlapings of 3 inches each suggest that all of those who walk in the High Calling as candidates for the Divine nature will eventually be in one of three classes: the Second Death, The Great Company or the Little Flock?

...[We think Bro. Jolly's application worthy of careful thought. And let us praise our God for His marvels!—The Editor.]...

Bro. Johnson appreciated the detailed letter Bro. Jolly sent to him pertaining to the Great Pyramid. You will notice the High Calling activity took place up to 1914. Candidates who were running for the "One Hope" of Eph. 4: 4 eventually will be in one of three classes. You will also notice the Youthful Worthies aren't mentioned.

Saturday, May 22, 2010

Permanent Marker Series: E4, Page 342


(Click the above image for best quality.)
Page 342 is just like page 339. All those faithful consecrators in the Executive Trustee's new timeline must be included here. Otherwise, they are associated with no one.

Sunday, May 16, 2010

Letter of General Interest

PT July 1935, page 118: "I also found a brother who used every argument he could concoct to resist the thought that we are in the Epiphany. He could not see a number of points I presented. Naturally I looked for the cause of his blindness on many simple truths that brethren not so gifted mentally as he is could easily see. So I asked him if he believed that the Harvest reaping had ended, that the High Calling had closed and that the Youthful Worthies are now being selected. He replied, No, to each question. Then I asked him when he consecrated, and he replied, in 1924. I urged him to guard his heart with all diligence and to avoid self-will, accepting the Lord's will instead, and resting in it. I fear that many candidates for Youthful Worthiship will lose out by resisting the Lord and His Truth and by insisting in self-will on marrying the Lord without His proposing to them." --Bro. R. G. Jolly

Saturday, May 8, 2010

Permanent Marker Series: E4, Page 339


(Click the above image for best quality.)
Page 339 is a lot like page 337. We have an obvious reference showing when unbegotten consecrators began to exist. The date is not 1878 as the Executive Trustee suggests, nor is there mention of a Youthful Worthy call as he shows in his "custom" Chart of the Ages that was introduced at the Ohio convention in 2009. How is it possible that a non Spirit-begotten individual can create a chart that has never existed before or modify the work of Bro. Russell?

Saturday, May 1, 2010

Does History Repeat Itself?

Question (1972)—Is it proper to pray for those Epiphany-enlightened Truth brethren who have brought forth serious error and who have been spreading it more or less widely among the Lord’s people, thus doing a sifting work?

Answer.—It depends on whether or not the individuals are new creatures. In E. 4, p. 122, Bro. Johnson says: “All new-creaturely sifters defile God’s Temple... But how about those who consecrated here in the end of the Age, but for whom no crowns were available, the Spirit-enlightened but not Spirit begotten ones, including all consecrators since the Fall of 1914, when the door of entrance into the High Calling closed (see PT No. 515)? Shortly before his death the Epiphany Messenger is said to have remarked that after his death the Youthful Worthies would be tested along the same lines that the new creatures had been tested during the Epiphany, and that he looked for many of them to fall in similar ways (see P. ’55, p. 66, par. 4). This prediction has certainly come true. And the principle given in Prov. 16: 18 (“Pride goeth before destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall”) has been manifested to a large extent by sifting errorists who have arisen from among the Youthful Worthies and have persisted despite expostulations from the Scriptures...

Sunday, April 25, 2010

Permanent Marker Series: E4, Page 337


(Click the above image for best quality.)
Page 337 is also a dilemma for the Executive Trustee. All those who were consecrating and proving faithful, and finding no crowns available for themselves, must now have that possibility starting in 1878. It is amazing that the "present view" idea that came from E4, pages 375 and 376 contradicts so many references in the same book. Does the Executive Trustee actually believe that Bro. Johnson changed his mind between 337 and 375? Why don't the brethren defend Bro. Johnson instead of supporting a man, a movement and such error?

Wednesday, April 21, 2010

The Epiphany Antitype-Immature Application


(28) Bro. Russell is not to be faulted for his immature application (in F 129) of the Gershonite Levites antitypically to "the saved world of mankind," because it was made before the fuller Truth on these Levites correctly applying antitypically to the Youthful Worthies was due to be understood (see E 4, p. 323). Likewise, Bro. Johnson is not to be faulted for making an immature application in E 11, p. 715, of "the five daughters of Zelophehad-(Num. 27: 1-11)" to the Youthful Worthies, because it was made before the fuller truth on them was due to be understood. He did not identify five groups of the Youthful Worthies as being typed by them. But his applying these daughters as typing the Youthful Worthies—Spirit-enlightened, non-Spirit-begotten fully consecrated ones—helps us to understand that these daughters do type associated tentatively justified brethren who in the post-Sept. 16, 1954 Epiphany period become Spirit-enlightened, non-Spirit-begotten fully consecrated ones—i.e., Consecrated Epiphany Campers. As we shall see from what follows, the Scriptures, reason and facts show that these daughters could not type Youthful Worthies; rather, in this setting they type Consecrated Epiphany Campers.

PT. 1977 Pg. 90

Saturday, April 17, 2010

Crowns - How Lord Chooses Replacements Since 1881.

Questions (1921)—Would not the Lord since 1881 invariably choose for vacant crowns those consecrators who were in the Truth?

Answer.—The Scriptures and facts given under the preceding question prove that such was not His course. He doubtless decided rather from the standpoint of the availability of the candidates for the particular vacant crown. This principle would cause Him sometimes to choose from those consecrators who were in the Truth, and sometimes from those not in the Truth, the latter furnishing the majority of those who were favored with the spirit begettal during the Harvest. Hence it is to be concluded that not the amount of Truth possessed, but the quality of the heart’s attitude toward the Truth possessed would be the largest factor in determining the Lord’s choice for a special crown. He coupled, of course, with this the person’s talents and providential situation as helping to make him available for that particular crown. ’21-30

Friday, April 9, 2010

Permanent Marker Series: E4, Page 327


(Click the above image for best quality.)
Page 327 offers the Executive Trustee a problem. Bro. Johnson tells us plainly that it is from 1881, not 1878, when there are brethren who are not Spirit begotten. That has to be moved back to meet the "present view" idea. We also have to move their development to the Harvest.

Bro. Jolly explains this in PT May-June, 1963, p. 43:
"Somewhat similarly, the Youthful Worthies, though developed as a class in the Epiphany, will nevertheless have their eventual inheritance as Millennial and post-Millennial Levites (E 4, p. 323; P '40, pp. 13, 14); they are not really Epiphany Levites, for the Great Company in its three groups—Kohathites, Merarites and Gershonites—are the Epiphany Levites. But their being Millennial Levites does not mean that the Millennial-Age Tabernacle must be in operation in the time in which they are developed in this life.

From the standpoint of their development, the Youthful Worthies are persisting Gospel-Age Levites. Note, e.g., Bro. Johnson's statements in E 4, p. 322: 'Remember of the Gospel-Age Levites that they lap over the Harvest Period, because of the lapping of the two Ages. . . . During the Transitional Period those Levites, the tentatively justified, who will not consecrate lose their tentative justification, i.e., cease to be tentative Levites and are put out of the Court; while those who do consecrate, the Youthful Worthies, retain their tentative justification and remain in the Court as Gospel-Age Levites [italics ours] of three groups, Kohathites, Merarites and Gershonites, throughout the Transitional Period.'

Thus the Youthful Worthies are 'persisting Gospel Age Levites in the transition time'—in the Epiphany Tabernacle—though they have their eventual inheritance as Millennial Levites. But this does not mean that the Gospel-Age and the Millennial-Age Tabernacles are "working" now. Only the Epiphany Tabernacle is 'working' now."

Thursday, April 1, 2010

Permanent Marker Series: E4, Page 323


(Click the above image for best quality.)
Now to page 323. If the Truth on the Youthful Worthies was not due before the Epiphany, then the Executive Trustee's separate and distinct class existing since 1881 was hidden for some unknown reason. The best we can do with this page is to point out this oddity.

Saturday, March 27, 2010

Psalms 107: 10, 11 - Supporting Error

E5 Pg 135: (57) The sixth slaughter weapon is Revolutionism (Ps. 107: 10, 11); and the Revolutionists are represented by the sixth slaughter-weapon man. Whoever among the consecrated revolts against the Lord's Truth and arrangements given through "that Servant" is represented in the sixth slaughter-weapon man; and whoever among the consecrated imbibes his errors and supports him in his practices is represented by those slain in the temple. Revolutionism has assumed several forms among Truth people: setting aside Truth by error and setting aside right arrangements by wrong ones. Both practices are against the Lord's protective ways given through "that Servant." One of the worst forms of the latter is Clericalism, which has manifested itself in two forms, general and local. General Clericalism has gotten control of the organizations among the Lord's people, and has more or less dominated over the general Church, while local clericalism manifests itself in local elders grasping for power and lording it over the ecclesias. One of our dear Pastor's last warnings was against clericalists, given in the article on "The Hour of Temptation" (Z. 1916, p. 327).

See Also: PT. 1957 Pg. 12; PT. QB Pg. 468 C2; PT. 1960 Pg. 52 C2; PT 1990 Pg. 3 BS 1990 Pg. 4

(The Sixth Slaughter Weapon) still active... See PT. 1969 Pg. 59; E5 Pg. 136

Saturday, March 20, 2010

French Correction, The Correction?



The Executive Trustee made a correction to the Ruth discourse he printed in the Winter issue. What was put forward in the recent Spring PT shows just how bizarre things have become. Instead of admitting that the entire discourse is not Bro. Johnson's words (even after we pointed it out), he calls the correction a misstatement. This is not accurate.

Merriam-Webster defines misstatement as, "to state incorrectly : give a false account of."

In reality, he correctly stated the errors as they exist in the original French document--but in a modern English translation. So, there is no misstatement. Please remember that what you are reading in this Ruth series is actually the following:


A French-speaking sister listens to Bro. Johnson and takes shorthand notes of his spoken discourse in French or English. Later, she types those notes in French into a document. The completed document from the unknown sister sits idle for almost 77 years. In 2009, it is translated back to modern English to be published in these PTs.

The Executive Trustee doesn't provide this information. He doesn't even make reference to the modern translator or thank the person for their translation. His correction should have been an apology to his readers for trying to pawn off this discourse as Bro. Johnson's own words. Where is the editorial integrity?

Sunday, March 14, 2010

Permanent Marker Series: E4, Page 318


(Click the above image for best quality.)
We're on page 318 and in need of a new marker. The Executive Trustee mentioned this reference during a California convention where he asked the brethren if they knew how to read. As you can see from our edits, he should have addressed himself. In order to make it work for him, we have to move the date and activity of individuals from 1881 to 1878 and the Epiphany class time period "now are" to 1881.

As was previously shown on this blog, the grammar is clear when you look at it. With our bracketed comments, the first part says: "Before the General Call to the Divine nature and joint-heirship with Christ ceased in 1881, the persons that we call 'Youthful Worthies' did not exist as individuals of a class; but since that time [the date given, 1881] they [plural, these persons or individuals] have been [in existence], and now [when written, in the Epiphany] are coming as such [a class] into existence, and are showing evidence of existence as such [a class]."

Monday, March 8, 2010

Permanent Marker Series: E4, Page 211


(Click the above image for best quality.)
We turn to page 211 in E4 with our edits. We could have modified many pages in the Azazel's Goat chapter, such as pages 163-167 or 217, but that would require a lot of marker ink. The chapter deals with the Little Flock and the Great Company, the first of the Epiphany's Elect. But because the Executive Trustee has moved the call of the Youthful Worthies to 1878 and their existence as a class to 1881, they should be mentioned everywhere in this chapter. Page 211 at least gives us the possibility to correct the one key sentence referring to ALL consecrators and then move on.

Thursday, March 4, 2010

Bro. August Gohlke Defends Previously Held Truth

In Question Book, p. 152 (comp. p. 153) we have the following question (of 1911) with Bro Russell's answer: "If any consecrated now and failed to be begotten of the Holy Spirit, where would the Lord place them?

"Answer. We would presume that if they were faithful, as the prophets of old were faithful, to the extent of laying down their lives in the service of righteousness and truth, that God would give them a share some way with the ancient worthies. In other words, that if such should pass into the time of trouble to a considerable degree, and there lose their lives because of faithfulness to the Lord, that he would do just the same for them that he will do for the ancient worthies—they will be counted in with the ancient worthy class."
Also, we read this in F 157: "Possibly they may be counted in with the ancient worthies who had the sacrificing disposition that is pleasing to God, prior to the beginning of the `high calling.'"
Thus Bro. Russell taught clearly that those consecrating after Oct. 1881 for whom no crowns were available would if faithful be "a similar class" to the Ancient Worthies and would share with them in similar nature and reward. But Bro. Russell did not give Scriptures to prove the existence of this class of consecrators.

THE YOUTHFUL WORTHY CLASS
The Lord in due time brought forth Scriptures proving the existence of a consecrated, non-Spirit-begotten class here in the end of the Age. It was through Bro. Johnson that He pointed out the Youthful Worthy class, the "young men [literally, youthfuls]" of Joel 2: 28, the earthen vessels of 2 Tim. 2: 20, the Millennial Gershonite Levites, a part of antitypical Elisha, Abed-nego in the fiery furnace, antitypical Ruth, the men of Ephraim of judges 7: 24—8: 3, the "flock" of Hab. 3: 17 (comp. Z 5383), etc. Many other Scriptures could be given—see PT No. 519; a copy free on request...

PT. 1981 Pg. 69 - 75

...We repeat it: When Bro. Russell spoke of the closing of the door of opportunity making it impossible for new ones to enter opportunities of suffering with Christ in preaching the Gospel, he meant the end of opportunities for new ones to do reaping work; for when he discussed that question in C (the Church's witness work to the world being then only incidental to harvesting), reaping was the only way of preaching the Gospel to others not in the Truth of which he then was aware as unfinished work for the Little Flock in the flesh. Hence, according to his view, after the reaping was finished there would be no more opportunity for new ones to enter into suffering with Christ as members of His Body, which implies that the door in sense (a) and means that the door in sense (b) would then be closed. But the reaping being ended in 1914 and the gleaning in 1916, no new aspirants could enter the High Calling, since it was after 1914 impossible for new consecrators to enter into opportunities to suffer with Christ as members of His Body, for this could be done only in connection with a work forever ended in 1914.

By the above we, of course, do not mean that there would be no more proclaiming of the Truth after the reaping was over, nor opportunity for the remaining Little Flock members, fully gathered, to suffer with Christ (though it could no longer be done in reaping); for certainly other service than reaping work was needed by the remaining Little Flock members after 1914, e.g., for building up one another, for dealing with the Great Company and the Youthful Worthies and for doing some work toward the public...

...All of such should consider carefully and soberly also that the losing of crowns by some and others being Spirit-begotten to take their places would not go on indefinitely, but must taper off and cease after a number of years and that if nothing else, just the passage of time—an entire century—should convince all of us that the loss of crowns and their being assigned to others would surely have ceased by now.

Furthermore, all of such should consider carefully and soberly if Bro. Russell was indeed not right in his teaching from the Scriptures, clearly corroborated by the Pyramid, that the Gospel Harvest reaping—and the door of entrance into the High Calling—closed, finally in the Fall of 1914, especially in view of all the evidence from Scripture, reason and facts presented in this article, PT No. 515 and elsewhere, and that therefore all consecrating since the Fall of 1914 have the grand privilege to be, not aspirants to the High Calling, but of "Those Consecrating Between the Ages" (Z 5761), the non-Spirit-begotten consecrated ones, who have the enlightenment, heart-warming and energizing of the holy Spirit, just as the Ancient Worthies did, and who as pre-Millennial consecrated ones will be associated with the Ancient Worthies in the Kingdom.

The Youthful Worthies, the fourth of the elect classes (see PT No. 519—a copy free on request), are as antitypical Levites to share the spirit nature after the Millennium with the Ancient Worthies (Z 5182).

It is high time for all Truth people to be awake and alert to the present situation in the Epiphany, or Apokalypsis, period, the Time of Trouble. We believe that, in view of the above-mentioned considerations from the Scriptures, reason and facts, all the consecrated should in proper humility now recognize their true standing before the Lord, not as prospective Little Flock and Great Company members, but as of "Those Consecrating Between the Ages."

The current Executive Trustee of the BS Ministries still insists on propping up his "present view" while ignoring these words of common sense. You will notice Bro. Gohlke doesn't contradict the Parousia and Epiphany Servants. He agrees with and builds on previous held Truths.

Monday, March 1, 2010

Conditions in Truth Groups

PT. 1976 Pg. 9, 10: "...It is sad, however, to see that, despite the passing of almost 100 years since the General Call to the High Calling ended, and over 60 years since 1914, when came the outbreak of the great Time of Trouble-the "plowman" that overtook the reaper (Amos 9:13; see Berean Comments; C 216; Z5761) - some claim that the reaping of the Little Flock is still going on, and they hold forth to new consecrators since the fall of 1914 the hope of the High Calling! These, especially such as persistently in the face of the light from God's Word insist on preaching this error, have much to answer for before the Lord..."